Recalls and Alerts: March 7-8, 2023

Here is today’s list of food safety recalls, product withdrawals, allergy alerts and miscellaneous compliance issues. The live links will take you directly to the official recall notices and company news releases that contain detailed information for each recall and alert.

If you would like to receive automatic email alerts for all new articles posted on eFoodAlert, please submit your request using the sidebar link.

United States

OUTBREAK UPDATE: FDA has initiated a traceback investigation in a new outbreak of Salmonella Hartford for which a food product has not yet been identified. Thirty-one people have been confirmed to have been infected with the outbreak strain.

FDA Warning Letter: FDA warns Arrow Reliance Inc. (dba Darwin’s Natural Pet Products) that the company is using an unapproved/unsafe animal food additive, that certain product lots of cat food are adulterated due to Salmonella contamination, and that the company has neglected to register with the FDA as a food facility as required by law. Arrow Reliance Inc. was given 15 business days in which to respond to the Warning Letter.

Europe

Allergy Alert (Germany): Genuport Trade GmbH recalls Daim 2er Riegel (56g; Lot OUV2030223; Best before 11.11.2023) due to undeclared allergens.

Allergy Alert Update (Spain): AESAN reports undeclared milk in ALPINA brand Original Oats drink (250g & 1000g; Product of Colombia; All lots where milk is not listed in the ingredient list).

Allergy Alert (UK): The Card Factory recalls Happy Easter Egg Hunt bag (198g; Best before end date January 2024) due to undeclared milk, peanuts and soy.

Food Safety Recall (Belgium): La Ferme du Bierleux recalls Ferme du Bierleux brand Beurre de ferme au lait cru de vache – doux & salé / Farm butter made with raw cow milk, sweet and salted (250g; Lot 090323; Use by 09/03/2023) due to possible Listeria monocytogenes contamination.

Food Safety Recall (France): GLACES THIRIET recalls THIRIET brand Mini pépite chèvre / tomate / Mini goat/tomato nuggets (150g; Lot 3372341A; Best before 07/06/2024) due to foreign matter contamination (plastic).

Food Safety Recall (France): TRELIDIS E.LECLERC recalls Rayon Fromage à la coupe brand Pecorino à la poire / Pecorino cheese with pear (Lot 2740; Best before 28/02/2023) due to Listeria monocytogenes contamination.

Food Safety Recall (France): SARL COMMENGES ET FILS recalls CHARCUTERIE COMMENGES brand MERGUEZ sausages – bulk and vacuum-packed (Lots 0209 & 0609; Use by 07/03/2023 & 09/03/2023, respectively) due to Salmonella contamination.

Food Safety Recall (Italy): COOPERATIVA PRODUTTORI SUINI PRO SUS SOCIETA’ COOPERATIVA AGRICOLA recalls IL MAIALE brand PREPARATO DI RAGU’ DI PURO SUINO / Pure pork sauce (350g; Lot 4749185; Best before 08-03-2023) due to Salmonella contamination.

Food Safety Recall (Luxembourg): Cactus recalls Cactus brand Lyoner sausage (250g; Lot 074.23; Use by 08/03/2023) due to foreign matter contamination (metal).

Asia, Africa and the Pacific Islands

Food Safety Recall (Hong Kong): City Super Limited recalls La Laitiere yoghurt-Vanilla and La Laitiere yoghurt-Natural (125g; Use by March 15, 2023; Product of France) due to foreign matter contamination (glass).

TAINTED formats 3 — “Reads like a true crime novel” – Food Safety News

Interested in learning more about food safety and the history of foodborne disease outbreaks and investigations?

Click on the link to listen to a short excerpt, then follow the buy links to add a digital, print or audio copy to your personal library.

Chapter 6. Birth of a Pathogen

TAINTED is available in digital format from all major on-line retailers. Press the button to go directly to your preferred digital bookstore.

Amazon

Apple

Barnes & Noble

Kobo

Smashwords

Chapters/Indigo

FDA warns Darwin’s in follow-up to sick cat complaint

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a stern warning to Arrow Reliance Inc. (doing business as Darwin’s Natural Pet Products), following what the agency referred to as an “inadequate” response to violations of the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act (FD&C Act) documented during an August-September 2022 inspection.

The inspection was carried out in response to a consumer complaint received by the FDA, in which the consumer reported that a Darwin’s cat food had caused illness in three kittens. The consumer provided documentation that a stool sample from one of the kittens tested positive for Salmonella.

Background

On July 8, 2022, the FDA was contacted by a consumer who complained that Darwin’s cat food had made her three kittens ill.

The FDA collected unopened packages of the suspect food from the consumer and found Salmonella in two samples.

With the Salmonella-positive results in hand, the FDA urged Darwin’s to initiate a recall of the contaminated products.

The company refused, and the FDA advised Darwin’s that the agency would issue a public caution.

On July 29, 2022, Darwin’s filed a request in federal court for a temporary restraining order to prevent the FDA from releasing information about the contaminated products to the public.

The court rejected the company’s request, and on August 5, 2022, the FDA finally was able to issue a caution to pet owners, advising them not to feed certain Darwin’s cat foods to their pets due to Salmonella contamination.

On August 23, 2022, the FDA began an inspection of Darwin’s manufacturing facility and, on September 30, 2022, handed a completed list of Inspectional Observations (FDA Form 483) to the company.

The company’s Director of Quality replied to the list of observations on October 14th.

What Darwin’s claims

Darwin’s claims that its Salmonella-contaminated raw pet foods are not adulterated, because (a) the microbe is not an “added substance,” and (b) it is up to the FDA to demonstrate that the Salmonella is present at a level that makes it “ordinarily injurious” to the intended consumer.

In its filing for the temporary restraining order, the company made reference to USDA enforcement policies for Salmonella and questioned why it should be acceptable for the pathogen to be present in raw poultry, beef and other meats for human consumption, but not in pet food.

Unresolved issues

1. Adulterated Animal Food

The FDA collected and analyzed unopened samples from the complainant.

One of the samples contained Salmonella Typhimurium, a serotype well known to cause both human and animal illness.

A second sample contained both Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Kentucky, another serotype known to cause disease.

A third sample collected during the inspection of Darwin’s manufacturing facility also yielded Salmonella Typhimurium.

Because Salmonella can cause serious–sometimes fatal–illness in humans and in animals, the FDA considers the presence of the microbe at any level to be hazardous if the food is meant to be consumed without cooking.

Therefore, the three lots of Salmonella-contaminated cat food were adulterated within the meaning of the FD&C Act, according to the Warning Letter.

2. Use of an Unapproved Food Additive

In 2021, the FDA expressed its concern to Darwin’s regarding the company’s use of peroxyacetic acid (PAA) as an additive to control pathogens in its raw pet foods, as the chemical was not “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) for the intended use.

During the 2022 inspection, the FDA observed that PAA was still being added to the pet foods, and that the company had increased the level of PAA to a concentration significantly higher than the recognized maximum safe level for its use in any food.

The FDA was unable to find any scientific data to indicate that the concentration of PAA incorporated into Darwin’s pet foods was safe for dogs or cats to consume.

The agency also reviewed documentation of a third-party lab study, undertaken on Darwin’s behalf, to validate the ability of PAA to control pathogens in the company’s raw pet foods. The FDA concluded that the level of pathogen control demonstrated during the study was inadequate to ensure a pathogen-free state in the company’s finished products.

3. Food Facility Registration

Under the FD&C Act, Darwin’s is required to register with the FDA as a “food facility.”

The company has long insisted that it supplies its products directly to customers and, as a “retail food establishment,” is exempt from this mandate.

However, Darwin’s ships the majority of its products to customers through third-party warehouses rather than directly from its manufacturing facility. Therefore, the company does not meet the definition of “retail food establishment” under the FD&C Act.

What happens next?

The company was given fifteen (15) working days to respond to the issues raised in the Warning Letter.

In the absence of a satisfactory response, the FDA may undertake legal action, including the possibility of seizure of products and/or seeking an injunction against the company.

Want to learn more about pathogens and other problems in commercial pet food?

Pre-order the digital edition of TOXIC today for automatic delivery on June 22, 2023.

Available from Amazon, Apple, Barnes & Noble, Kobo, and Smashwords.

Raw pet food company sues to block FDA public health alert

Arrow Reliance Inc. (d.b.a. Darwin’s Natural Pet Products) has filed suit in US federal court in an attempt to prevent the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from issuing a Public Health Alert about possible Salmonella contamination in a cat food product.

Darwin’s, which is based in Tukwila, Washington, filed the their request for a temporary restraining order on July 29, 2022, in the US District Court, Western District of Washington (Case 2:22-cv-01057).

The lawsuit contends that the FDA “wrongfully” threatened to issue the Public Health Alert if the company refused to issue a recall of its adult cat food.

The FDA’s request for a product recall apparently arose after kittens tested positive for Salmonella.

When contacted by eFoodAlert, a spokesperson for the FDA stated that the agency does not comment on pending litigation.

The background

Darwin’s is the producer and distributor of a range of raw food products for dogs and cats.

The company was founded in 2002 by Gary Tashjian, who began producing frozen raw pet foods in his own kitchen.

In time, Tashjian moved his manufacturing operations into a facility in Tukwila, WA, just outside of Seattle.

In June 2016, the FDA received a consumer complaint about foreign objects in the company’s products. In response, the FDA and representatives from the Washington State Department of Agriculture (WSDA) paid a visit to the Tukwila facility.

During the course of their visit, the FDA and state investigators noted several objectionable conditions in the production plant. They also reviewed the company’s consumer complaint log, including four complaints that mentioned Salmonella.

As part of their follow-up, WSDA inspectors sampled two of the finished raw pet food products for lab analysis. One of those samples was found to contained Salmonella.

In response, the company destroyed its inventory of the contaminated production lot. As none of the product had been shipped, there was no need for a recall.

In December 2017, following a spate of product recalls due variously to Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella, and/or E. coli O28 in multiple product samples, the FDA returned to Darwin’s plant to conduct an intensive investigation that lasted until late January 2018.

During the course of its investigation, the FDA became aware of at least six customer complaints about sick pets, including one dead kitten.

On April 2, 2018, the FDA issued a formal Warning Letter, notifying the company of its findings and giving the company fifteen business days in which to respond with a written description of corrective actions.

The company was reinspected in 2018/19, during which time Darwin’s management refused to supply the FDA investigation team with records pertaining to the production, sanitation, environmental testing and distribution of finished product lots using the same protein ingredients as two samples that were identified positive for the presence of Salmonella.

FDA inspected Darwin’s again in June 2021. This time, the company cooperated fully with the inspectors, who noted a few observations of concern. These were corrected by company management before the inspection was completed, and no formal list of Inspectional Observations was issued.

The current situation

At the moment, there is no information available beyond what has been included in the company’s request for a temporary restraining order.

If the request is not granted, the FDA will be free to release additional details, including a Public Health Alert, if it chooses to do so.

In the interim, any consumer who suspects that a Darwin’s product may have caused his dog or cat to become ill should file a formal complaint with the FDA, using the agency’s pet food complaint portal.

For additional information on safety issues surrounding the feeding of raw pet food to companion animals, check out the FDA website

Learn more about a variety of food safety issues in TAINTED. From Farm Gate to Dinner Plate, Fifty Years of Food Safety Failures, now available in digital, print and audiobook editions.