Evanger’s proposes donating recalled pet food. FDA says ‘no’

The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has vetoed a proposal by Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Co. to donate recalled pet food to animal shelters after conducting random spot-checks for pentobarbital.

The proposal was revealed in a June 29, 2017 Warning Letter issued by FDA, and released on its website Tuesday morning (July 4, 2017) under the agency’s standing policy to post recent Warning Letters on a weekly basis.

The letter addressed to Holly N. Sher and Joel A. Sher, President and Vice President, respectively, notifies them that FDA found “…serious violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) and its implementing regulations” during an investigation that included supplier traceback, facility inspection, and analysis of samples collected by FDA.

In its response to the Evanger’s proposal to donate recalled pet food, FDA said that finding the contents of individual cans of food from recalled lots to be negative for pentobarbital would not provide “…sufficient assurance that the remaining units are not adulterated.”

After stating that FDA’s own testing confirmed the pentobarbital contamination not to be homogeneous throughout an entire lot, the agency declined Evanger’s proposal and recommended destruction of all remaining recalled product.

The Warning Letter is the most recent development in an investigation of Evanger’s that began in early January with the reported illness of five dogs in a single household and the death of one of the dogs. Lab tests conducted on the gastric contents of the dead dog and on the remains of Evanger’s Hunk of Beef au Jus canned dog food that had been fed to all five of the animals, revealed the presence of a ‘large quantity’ of pentobarbital in both samples.

FDA opened its investigation immediately upon becoming aware of the incident. A team of inspectors began an on-site inspection of Evanger’s manufacturing facility in Wheeling, Illinois on January 10, 2017.

On February 14, 2017, the inspection team furnished Evanger’s management with a Form 483, listing a series of Inspectional Observations, including:

• Pentobarbital found in a sample of Evanger’s Hand Packed Hunk of Beef au Jus, 12 oz. can (Lot #1816E06HB13)
• Pentobarbital found in a sample of Against the Grain brand Grain Free Pulled Beef with Gravy Dinner for Dogs, 12 oz. can (Lot #2415E01ATB12; BEST DEC 2019)
• Condensate dripping throughout the facility, including into open cans in-process and onto totes of raw meat
• Pitted, cracked and damaged floors
• Peeling paint, mold throughout the facility and a live ‘fly-like insect’ in the hand-packing area during processing
• Inadequate temperature controls

In addition to the two pentobarbital-positive samples cited in the February 14th Form 483, FDA has found pentobarbital in the following five production lots of Evanger’s dog food:

• Braised Beef Chunks, lot code 2016E08BBW11 Best Aug 2020.
• Hunk of Beef Au Jus, lot code 1816E14HBC18 Best June 2020.
• Hunk of Beef Au Jus, lot code 1816E02HB12 Best June 2020.
• Hunk of Beef Au Jus, lot code 1316E23HB09 Best Jan 2020.
• Hunk of Beef Au Jus, lot code 1816E03HB17 Best June 2020.

On March 3, 2017, Evanger’s voluntarily recalled all cans of Evanger’s Braised Beef Chuncks, Evanger’s Hunk of Beef Au Jus and Against the Grain Pulled Beef with Gravy manufactured between December 2015 and January 2017.

In correspondence dated 2/4/2017, 2/21/2017, 4/4/2017, 5/18/2017 and 5/23/2017, Evanger’s addressed FDA’s Inspectional Observations, and proposed a series of corrective actions. In addition to the proposed donation of recalled product, the following actions, listed in the Warning Letter, are those FDA found to be inadequate or unacceptable.

Evanger’s discontinued doing business with the meat supplier alleged by the company to be the source of the adulterated meat.

Evanger’s was unable to supply any documentation or evidence that the indicated supplier was the only one who supplied the contaminated raw materials. Therefore, FDA was unable to evaluate whether or not this was an adequate response.

Evanger’s suggested that if pentobarbital were to be present in any of its ground loaf products, it would be “…well within the range that FDA had previously deemed not to be a health or safety concern in pet foods.”

FDA disagrees that grinding would dilute any pentobarbital to safe levels, and points out that there is zero tolerance for pentobarbital in pet food.

Evanger’s proposed random pentobarbital tests of finished products prior to shipment as a way to ensure that raw materials are not adulterated.

FDA considers this to be an inadequate and unreliable way to ensure the safety of the finished product. FDA’s own testing has demonstrated pentobarbital contamination is not uniformly distributed throughout all cans in a production lot. Also, the agency disagrees that finished product testing can mitigate the risk of pentobarbital in the raw material.

Evanger’s now requires new and current suppliers to provide letters of guarantee for their products.

FDA points out that a letter of guarantee may not provide adequate assurance of product safety, and recommends conducting site audits and/or reviews of supplier procedures in addition to the letter of guarantee.

As is customary, the Warning Letter concludes with a requirement that Evanger’s must furnish a written reply within fifteen working days, spelling out the steps it has taken or will take to correct the violations and prevent them from occurring again.

The complete text of the Warning Letter can be found on the FDA website.

This article first appeared in Food Safety News and is reposted here with permission.

Second class action suit filed in pentobarbital pet food scandal

Texas pet owner Wendy Black has initiated a complaint seeking class action status against Party Animal Inc. and Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Company, Inc.

The suit, filed June 6 in the Superior Court for Los Angeles County’s Central District seeks damages “…on behalf of all persons who purchased Party Animal organic brand dog food … in the four years prior to the filing of this complaint.”

Evanger’s produced the dog food for Party Animal.

Black fed two varieties of Party Animal’s Cocolicious canned dog food to Bianca, a miniature Schnauzer she was fostering, according to the complaint. Bianca allegedly became severely ill after consuming the dog food, requiring veterinary visits, including administration of IV fluids.

In early March, realizing that Bianca’s ongoing illness appeared to be linked to consumption of the Party Animal food, Black communicated in writing with the retailer where she bought it. Shortly thereafter, she was contacted by a representative of Evanger’s, who instructed her to assemble the remaining cans of food in her possession for pick-up by Federal Express, promising to replace the cans with a different food at no cost.

Black returned some of the food, but retained a portion, submitting a sample to Texas A&M University for testing. The test result was positive for pentobarbital, according to the lawsuit.

Following receipt of the pentobarbital test result, Black requested tests to determine whether the Cocolicious pet food ingredient label was accurate. According to her lawsuit, lab tests revealed that the sample, which was purported to contain coconut oil, “… did not contain coconut or coconut compounds as advertised.”

Black is seeking “…appropriate compensatory damages and restitutionary disgorgement…” for herself and on behalf of others who bought Party Animal dog food, as well as punitive damages. She has requested a jury trial.

On April 24, Party Animal recalled two lots of its Cocolicious canned dog food, manufactured in 2015, because of possible contamination with the animal euthanasia drug pentobarbital. The recalled dog food can be identified by the following label information:

  • Cocolicious Beef & Turkey dog food with the Lot # 0136E15204 04 and a best-by date of July 2019; and
  • Cocolicious Chicken & Beef dog food with the Lot # 0134E15 237 13 and a best-by date of August 2019.

Party Animal Inc. filed suit in federal court in May against Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Co. Inc. because dog food Evanger’s produced for Party Animal was found to be contaminated with the animal euthanasia drug pentobarbital.

This article first appeared in Food Safety News and is reposted here with permission.

Dog owners file $5 million action against Evanger’s, Nutripack

Nicole and Guy Mael, whose dog Talula died after eating Evanger’s brand “Hunk of Beef Au Jus” canned dog food on New Year’s Eve, have filed a class action complaint against Evanger’s Dog and Cat Food Co. Inc. and its sister company Nutripack LLC.

The complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington on June 16, alleges fraud, misrepresentation and negligence on the part of Evanger’s and Nutripack. The complaint requests a jury trial.

The couple’s five dogs all became ill after eating the Hunk of Beef food. They took them all to an emergency veterinary facility. Four of the five dogs survived, although one of the survivors is currently being treated for seizures.

Lab analysis of Talula’s stomach contents and of the remainder of the contents of the can of Hunk of Beef revealed the presence of a large quantity of pentobarbital.

Pentobarbital is a fast-acting barbiturate, and is used as a veterinary euthanasia agent. Its presence in any food or animal feed renders the food or feed adulterated, according to the federal law.

The Food and Drug Administration confirmed the presence of pentobarbital by laboratory analysis of samples taken from sealed cans of Evanger’s Hunk of Beef Au Jus and Against The Grain branded Pulled Beef with Gravy canned dog food, prompting Evanger’s to initiate a series of product recalls.

In addition to the pentobarbital finding, an inspection of Evanger’s production facility in Wheeling, IL, and of Nutripack’s facility in Markham, IL, revealed insanitary conditions in both facilities, according to FDA.

The class action suit cites thirteen counts under federal, Illinois, and Washington state law, based upon claims of:

  • breach of implied warranty:
  • breach of express warranty;
  • unfair acts or practices;
  • deceptive acts or practices;
  • negligence;
  • defective manufacture, design, and marketing;
  • unjust enrichment;
  • misrepresentation; and
  • product adulteration and misbranding.

In addition to seeking restitution, estimated to exceed $5 million from Evanger’s and Nutripack, the plaintiffs have requested an injunction to prevent the companies “…from continuing the unlawful practices … including marketing or selling its products that may be misrepresented, adulterated and misbranded, and specifically falsely stating that they are USDA-inspected, human-grade quality, 100 percent kosher beef and directing defendants to engage in corrective action, or providing other injunctive or equitable relief.”

This article first appeared in Food Safety News and is reposted here with permission.