FDA is now a black box

The FDA communications teams have been trashed by the Trump administration. Likewise, the Freedom of Informaction Act (FOIA) response teams and policy teams.

What does this mean for public health and food safety?

Siobhan DeLancey, a 21-year veteran of the FDA, who for the last several years managed communications for the agency’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), didn’t mince words in her recent Opinion piece in Food Safety News.

There will be no more safety alerts, no bird flu updates, no information detailing what we’re doing about PFAS. No leverage to spur a recalcitrant company to do the right thing. No news about pesticides or antimicrobial use.

She went on to say,

[G]ood luck relying on a timely response to your FOIA request to reveal the inner working of the agency or gleaning information from the Federal Register. Guidances for Industry on how to comply with the law? Doubt you’ll see many in the next four years, and even if one gets through deregulation, how will you know?

On April 22, 2025, pet food safety advocate, Sue Thixton, reported in Truth About Pet Food that a pet owner had arranged for two samples of Answers Pet Food to be tested for the presence of gentamicin by an independent laboratory.

Gentamicin is an antibiotic whose use is discouraged in cattle due to its long retention time in animal tissue. The US Federal Register does not cite a permitted level of gentamicin in beef tissue. Canada lists a maximum residue limit of 0.1 parts per million (ppm) in muscle of cattle.

One of the samples—ANSWERS PET FOOD STRAIGHT BEEF—was found by the lab to contain 320.6 ppm of gentamicin. The second sample—Answers Pet Food Detailed Beef—contained 76.2 ppm.

According to Thixton’s post, multiple pets became very ill, but survived. She added, “It is unknown if a recall will be issued on these products.”

The following day, Answers Pet Food posted a multi-paragraph rebuttal on its Facebook page, calling the pet owner’s claim “baseless.”

Prior to January 22, 2025, when Trump took office, it would have been possible to contact the CVM communications team by email or phone, find out whether or not the agency was aware of the situation and, if necessary, point them to the posted report.

On several occasions in the past, eFoodAlert has done exactly that, with the result that a problem of which the CVM was previously unaware became flagged for follow-up.

One such occasion was the concern raised by multiple pet owners early in 2024 about Purina pet foods.

Now this avenue no longer exists.

There is no longer any way of communicating informally with the CVM or with other areas within the FDA.

There is no longer any way of learning in a timely fashion whether the CVM knows about this incident.

Even if the CVM investigates and discovers a problem, unless the company recalls the product, there will be no alert to consumers, because there is no one left to write the notice.

While it may still be possible to submit a Freedom of Information Act request to learn whether other pet owners have reported similary issues or whether there was an inspection of the manufacturing facility, the chances of receiving a timely response to such a request have dropped to nil, due to lack of personnel.

I have had dealings with Siobhan DeLancey and various other members of the FDA’s communications teams for almost two decades. I have always found them to be professional, thoroughly invested in the importance of their work, and eager to furnish whatever information and explanations permitted within the bounds of confidentiality requirements.

Without the assistance of Siobhan and her colleagues, and without the work of the FOIA teams, I never would have been able to research and write my two food safety books.

I shall leave the final word to Siobhan (again, from her Food Safety News piece):


TAINTED formats 3
“Reads like a true crime novel” – Food Safety News

Interested in learning more about food safety and the history of foodborne disease outbreaks and investigations?

Click on the link to listen to a short excerpt, then follow the buy links to add a digital, print or audio copy to your personal library.

Chapter 6. Birth of a Pathogen


“A complete and compelling account of the hidden and not-so-hidden ways the food we give our beloved pets can be contaminated.” JoNel Aleccia, Health Reporter, Food & Nutrition, The Associated Press.

“An invaluable resource for busy pet owners” – Food Safety News

Pet food safety advocate petitions FDA to update public on current investigation into pet illnesses

Noted pet food safety advocate, Susan Thixton (Truth About Pet Food), has filed a Citizen Petition with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on behalf of pet owners.

In her petition, dated April 17, 2024, Thixton requested that, “…the Commissioner of Food and Drugs … promptly inform the public to (sic) current pet food investigations in the same manner the agency has updated the public in the past.”

According to the petition, “[b]eginning in approximately December 2023, pet food consumers began reporting serious health issues with their pets (cats and dogs) directly related to pet food. To date of this Petition, more than 2,600 pet owners have reported serious health concerns with their cat or dog. Symptoms reported are very similar; bloody diarrhea, bloody vomiting, in many instances seizures. More than 500 pet deaths have been reported by pet owners. One brand of pet food in particular, pet owners have reported 1,679 cat and dog illnesses, 23% of those reports (390) resulted in the death of the pet.”

The petition requests a release of adverse event reporting data, a summary of the status of the FDA’s investigation, and issuance of a public notice, including an encouragement for pet owners to report any illnesses to the agency.

In support of the request, the petition cites several precedents, including the recent public alert for lead in applesauce products, the investigation into possible links between pet foods and canine heart disease, and the years-long investigation into the link between certain jerky treats and pet illnesses.

Thixton has included a link to the full text of the Citizen Petition in her story, “How Much More Serious Does It Have To Get?”

Individuals who wish to file support for this petition can do so by emailing the FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine using this email address and Subject Line:

Email: AskCVM@fda.hhs.gov
Subject Line: Docket ID FDA-2024-P-1916-0001


I was one of the first individuals to make the FDA aware of the spike in pet illnesses/deaths being reported on social media, and the allegations linking those illnesses/deaths to Purina ProPlan foods for dogs and cats.

eFoodAlert posted its first story on this subject on January 4, 2024, and has on a number of occasions requested comments and feedback from FDA media coordinators on the status of the investigation. Unlike the previous investigations referenced in Thixton’s filing, no information has been forthcoming from the agency, either in the form of a public release or advisory, or in the form of a comment for publication.

Earlier today, I contacted the Center for Veterinary Medicine for comment on the filing of the Citizen Petition.

An agency spokesperson replied, “The FDA is reviewing the citizen petition and will respond directly to the petitioner.”

In the information vacuum created by the absence of a public advisory, there has been a range of speculation on social media, including accusations that the FDA is “in the pocket” of Nestlé Purina and other large pet food manufacturers, and that the agency is working with these manufacturers to suppress evidence of a significant problem. 

Such speculation can only hurt the credibility of the FDA in its handling of this and other pet food safety investigations.

While it is understandable that the FDA does not want to fuel panic, the agency’s total silence is having the opposite effect.

In the interests of the health and safety of our pets, of transparency, of keeping the public informed, and of FDA’s own credibility, eFoodAlert fully supports the Citizen Petition filed by Susan Thixton of Truth About Pet Food on behalf of pet owners.



“A complete and compelling account of the hidden and not-so-hidden ways the food we give our beloved pets can be contaminated.” JoNel Aleccia, Health Reporter, Food & Nutrition, The Associated Press.

“An invaluable resource for busy pet owners” – Food Safety News

Available from all major on-line retailers, including:

Jerky pet treats: Anatomy of an investigation and lingering concerns

This story by Phyllis Entis first appeared in Food Safety News and is reposted here with permission.

More than 10 years after the first reports of pet and people illnesses linked to jerky treats from China, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is no closer to finding the root cause of the problem.

From August 2007 through Dec. 31, 2015, the number of illness complaints linked to jerky pet treats included more than 6,200 dogs, 26 cats, and three people. More than 1,140 of the dogs died.

In a Grand Rounds webinar in recent days, Dr. Lee Anne Palmer of FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) summarized the outcome of the agency’s decade-long investigation.

The first hint of trouble appeared in August 2007, when bloggers reported the removal of chicken jerky pet treats from the shelves of a major retailer due to traces of melamine in the treats.

In September 2007, the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) alerted its members to reports of an acquired form of Fanconi syndrome in dogs. Fanconi syndrome is a potentially fatal disorder of the urinary tract.

Later that same month, FDA advised pet owners of a “… potential association between development of illness in dogs and the consumption of chicken jerky products…” The agency reported having received in excess of 70 complaints involving more than 95 dogs. In addition, FDA received information from Banfield, The Pet Hospital suggesting an association between exposure to chicken jerky products and signs of gastrointestinal illness in dogs, including vomiting and diarrhea.

FDA investigated the reports, but was unsuccessful in finding the cause of the illnesses.

In late 2013, FDA issued a comprehensive update on its investigation, including a fact sheet for pet owners and a “Dear Veterinarian” letter requesting specific clinical data. The update triggered an immediate, massive increase in illness reports.

In 2014, FDA enlisted the help of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to design and run a case control study. Scientists from CVM and CDC enrolled 95 affected dogs from 31 states for the study, matching them with 261 controls. 

The case control study, first of its kind for a pet illness investigation, determined that the illnesses were highly associated with consumption of pet jerky treats from China. There was also some association with jerky treats from the United States. 

Ill dogs were more likely to be female, and small breeds were more likely to be affected than larger breeds. No other exposures were associated with the pet illnesses.

Since 2007, FDA has received reports of pet illness related to jerky treats from all 50 U.S. states, most Canadian provinces, and several other countries, including the United Kingdom, Germany, Switzerland, and Singapore, according to Palmer.

In 2007, the only way for consumers or veterinarians to report pet illnesses to FDA was by contacting a Consumer Complaint Coordinator by telephone. There was no system in place to coordinate or collate the reports. Even today, as Palmer observed, there is no CDC for pets.

In May 2010, CVM introduced the Safety Reporting Portal, an on-line form that can be used by consumers and veterinarians to report illnesses linked to pet foods, treats or medications.

In January 2011, CVM combined the two parallel information streams into a single database and initiated a weekly review of the data to identify trends. 

FDA obtained funding in 2010 to establish the Veterinary Laboratory Response Network (Vet-LIRN), a collaborative network of government and university laboratories that form the backbone of FDA’s ability to document, investigate, and diagnose animal feed, pet food, and animal drug-related illnesses. This powerful resource was activated in August 2011 and has now grown to include 43 participating laboratories.

While FDA’s efforts did not establish a single root cause of pet illnesses linked to jerky pet treats, the investigations revealed a number of issues resulting in recalls or import alerts for various problems, including:

  • Salmonella contamination
  • Residues of antibiotic and antiviral agents
  • Mislabelling
  • Melamine traces
  • Excessive levels of glycerin

The cumulative effect of these recalls and import alerts produced, over time, a significant reduction in the number pet illnesses associated with pet jerky treats.

According to a spokesperson for FDA, the number of reported illnesses associated with jerky pet treats has waned in recent years and returned to baseline levels. The agency is dialing back its use of investigative resources on jerky pet treats to focus on other types of pet food product complaints. 

FDA expects to publish a final update on its website summarizing the investigation at a future date.

Although a single root cause of the treat-related illnesses was never found, the analytical and tracking tools developed during the treat investigation have helped CVM to more quickly identify and respond to several other pet food issues in recent years. These include:

  • Pentobarbital contamination in canned dog foods
  • Thiamine deficiency in cat food
  • Vitamin D excess in dog food
  • Thyroid gland contamination of canned dog food and domestic jerky treats
  • Salmonella contamination of dry dog foods
  • Listeria and Salmonella in raw pet foods
  • Dilated cardiomyopathy and grain-free dog foods

Consumers and veterinarians who are concerned about a pet illness that appears to be linked to a pet food or pet treat should report the incident using FDA’s Safety Reporting Portal or by contacting the Consumer Complaint Coordinator for their district.