This opinion piece by Bill Marler first appeared on Marler Blog and is reposted here with the author’s permission.
As I wrote last Spring, I have tried to steer clear of politics with respect to the Felon in Chief, but this is nuts, or at least peanuts. According to yet another edict from the White House, it is now the policy of the United States that:
(a) Criminal enforcement of criminal regulatory offenses is disfavored.
(b) Prosecution of criminal regulatory offenses is most appropriate for persons who know or can be presumed to know what is prohibited or required by the regulation and willingly choose not to comply, thereby causing or risking substantial public harm. Prosecutions of criminal regulatory offenses should focus on matters where a putative defendant is alleged to have known his conduct was unlawful.
(c) Strict liability offenses are “generally disfavored.” United States v. United States Gypsum, Co., 438 U.S. 422, 438 (1978). Where enforcement is appropriate, agencies should consider civil rather than criminal enforcement of strict liability regulatory offenses or, if appropriate and consistent with due process and the right to jury trial, see Jarkesy v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 603 U.S. 109 (2024), administrative enforcement.
(d) Agencies promulgating regulations potentially subject to criminal enforcement should explicitly describe the conduct subject to criminal enforcement, the authorizing statutes, and the mens rea standard applicable to those offenses.
Typically, every crime has two elements—a bad act and a culpable state of mind (mens rea, which generally means intent or recklessness). Section 333(a)(1) of the FDCA, the misdemeanor provision, is noteworthy because it creates one of the few true strict liability crimes in federal criminal law. That is, the government does not need to prove a state of mind to obtain a conviction. If a food product is misbranded or adulterated and is distributed into the channels of interstate commerce, a crime has been committed. Depending upon the nature of the conduct, a violation of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act may be a felony or a misdemeanor. Misdemeanor violations of section 331 are punishable by a maximum prison sentence of one year and a maximum fine of $100,000.
Perhaps the folks at the Peanut Corporation of America would still be prosecuted as a felony, but they certainly argued that they did not know the peanut butter was tainted with Salmonella. However, if this new policy stands it is not likely the Blue Bell, Kerry, Con Agra, Chipotle, Wright County, Odwalla nor Jensen Farms would have been prosecuted, and it is likely that few prosecution will occur in the future.
Even if they had an appetite to prosecute, there will be no one there to do the work. According to Sarah N. Lynch at Reuters:
A Justice Department unit that handles criminal and civil enforcement of U.S. food and drug safety laws is being disbanded as part of an ongoing cost-cutting campaign by President Donald Trump’s administration…
About 215 people work for the Consumer Protection Branch, part of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, including attorneys, support staff and law enforcement agents…
Although it is located in the Civil Division, the Consumer Protection Branch is an unusual office because its work involves a hybrid of criminal prosecutions and civil enforcement.
It handles criminal cases to enforce the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, a federal law that makes it a crime to sell or distribute adulterated or misbranded food or drugs. It also enforces statutes for the Federal Trade Commission and the Consumer Product Safety Commission…
The Consumer Protection Branch has been at the heart of some high-profile cases…
Prosecutors from the branch also brought the criminal case against former executives at Peanut Corporation for crimes that led to a 2009 outbreak involving more than 700 cases of salmonella poisoning.
On November 26th (Thanksgiving Day eve in the USA), the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a fistful of Establishment Inspection Reports (EIRs) and Inspectional Observational reports (FDA Form 483s) pertaining to inspections carried out between 2022 and 2025 at ByHeart production and packaging locations in Reading (Pennsylvania), Portland (Oregon), and Allerton (Iowa).
This document dump did not include any preliminary information relating to the current investigation triggered by an outbreak of infant botulism in newborns and infants who were fed ByHeart Whole Nutrition Infant Formula.
Nevertheless, the EIRs provide a window into the company’s operations and its approach to food safety.
New kid on the block
In 2019, after some three years of developing and refining their formula, ByHeart acquired their manufacturing facility in Reading and according to the company’s website, “…upgraded it to provide the very best conditions…” for producing powdered infant formula base.
Reading, PA
Although the facility sailed through a FDA inspection in May/June 2022 with a classification of No Action Indicated, conditions in Reading were far from perfect.
At the completion of the May/June 2022 inspection, FDA investigators noted several “items for discussion,” including:
Incomplete environmental swabbing follow-up after a water leak from the roof that occurred;
The firm did not test for the same pathogens after the water event as they do during their Environmental Monitoring Program;
Production records revealed multiple cross-outs and corrections by the Quality department for incorrect lot codes of ingredients, job number, customer lot number, etc., and at times, the handwriting was too small to interpret;
Environmental swabbing recording form was not always fully completed; and
Drying time was not being documented on the Infant Formula Dryer Processing Report.
Management agreed to address all of the items; however, some issues remained when the FDA returned on December 21, 2022.
During that inspection, which was closed out on February 17, 2023, FDA investigators learned that the Reading location was notified in October 2022 that Cronobacter sakazakii had been found in a finished product for which Reading provided the base formula. Reading conducted a “root cause analysis” and concluded that the positive test was the result of an error on the part of the 3rd party contract lab.
The lab rebutted Reading’s contention, with a report that concluded “Laboratory error was not found or supported.”
This was not the only incident of Cronobacter sakazakii in the company’s product or the production environment. Nor was it the only issue highlighted during the FDA inspection. The outcome of the inspection was classified as Official Action Indicated.
On August 30, 2023, the FDA issued a Warning Letter to ByHeart citing “…significant violations of Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 106 (21 C.F.R. Part 106), Infant Formula Requirements Pertaining to Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Quality Control Procedures, Quality Factors, Records and Reports, and Notifications (“the Infant Formula Rule”).”
In September 2023, the company ceased production at its Reading facility and has not yet resumed operations.
The next inspection took place from December 11, 2023 to January 19, 2024, while the plant was shut down and consisted, for the most part, of a review of records.
Once again, the FDA investigators identified a list of violations, including mold contamination in a water tank, a history of multiple roof leaks and water leaks, significant insect activity, and inadequate or improper temperature monitoring and documentation, among others. The FDA issued a Form 483 list of Objectionable Conditions and the inspection was classified as Official Action Indicated.
Portland, OR
ByHeart purchased the Portland blending and packaging facility in January 2023.
Until December 1, 2023, Portland received powdered infant formula base from both Reading and Allerton, blended lactoferrin into the base powder, and filled the complete infant formula powder into cans. After that date, all base poiwder was supplied by Allerton.
The FDA conducted its first post-purchase inspection of the Portland location in April 2024, at which time the facility was in a scheduled shutdown. The inspection included a review of seven production batch records, as well as of documents pertaining to environmental monitoring, sanitation, water events, microbiological and nutrient testing, and so forth. No significant issues were recorded, and the inspection was classified as No Action Indicated.
In March 2025, the FDA carried out a more thorough inspection of the plant’s operations. Part of the inspection included a follow-up to consumer complaints received by the FDA and/or ByHeart since the previous inspection. Among these were ten complaints relating to gastrointestinal illnesses, including:
Eight Salmonella
One E. coli
One Campylobacter
In every case, the firm’s investigation (based solely on a review of records) concluded there was no evidence that the microbe had come from in the infant formula batch, and no further action was taken.
Allerton, IA
ByHeart announced its acquisition of the Allerton facility from Dairy Farmers of America in January 2023. In doing so, it purchased a peck of trouble.
The final FDA inspection (conducted in May-June 2022) of Allerton prior to ByHeart’s purchase highlighted problems with cleaning and sanitation, presence of Cronobacter sakazakii in the environment around a spray dryer, numerous roof leaks into the processing areas, a finding of Cronobacter in a batch of finished product, temperature chart calibration issues, and flow meter calibration issues.
The 2022 inspection was classified Voluntary Action Indicated. In June 2023, the FDA conducted a follow-up inspection in order to review the new owner’s corrective actions. Some of the issues were verified as corrected, whereas others would have to wait until the company began manufacturing. During the final meeting with Allerton’s management team, the FDA investigator stressed that “…continuous improvement and routine maintenance to [the] aging facility would be vital to prevent contamination of the powdered infant formula supply.”
In January 2024, with the facility now in full operation, the FDA team documented multiple improvements to the physical plant, although inspection of the internal surfaces of a spray dryer revealed multiple cracks, areas of denting, and weld spatter. The inspection was classified as No Action Indicated.
One year later, Allerton’s performance had deteriorated. An inspection conducted in February 2025 noted that the company had twelve confirmed Cronobacter sakazakii in environmetal samples from January 2024 to February 2025. In addition, the inspectors observed rusty surfaces in multiple on the floor of one of the dryer levels, documented that epoxied surfaces were peeling, and noted that the floor under one of the air duct had rust.
On reviewing the Allerton pest management program, inspectors documented multiple instances of rodent activity. Additionally, FDA inspectors took exception to the company’s approval and release for use on more than one occasion of an ingredient that was part of a shipment showing evidence of rodent activity, including rodent excreta and torn bags.
During the closeout discussion, Kathleen Whitesell, the Senior Director of Food Safety, who oversees food safety and quality for all three ByHeart locations, insisted that the rodent infestation did not represent a food safety concern, due to the existence of a ‘kill step.’ In response, the FDA investigators reminded the firm that “…although there may be a ‘kill step,’ it is not a good practice to add to the microbial load…” prior to that step.
The February 2025 inspection was classified Voluntary Action Indicated.
The take-aways
Old facilities are maintenance-intensive
ByHeart’s facility in Reading was built in 1993. The company purchased it from Sensory Effects Powder Systems in 2019.
The Allerton plant was purchased from Dairy Farmers of America in 2023 and was described by FDA investigators as an “aging facility” that would require “continuous improvement and routine maintenance.”
Both of these facilities have undergone prolonged production shutdowns for maintenance and repair since ByHeart acquired them.
FDA inspections are not created equal
Inspections conducted during production shutdowns are a waste of time. Very little is proved by a “review of records” other than the company’s diligence in record-keeping.
The June 2023 inspection of Allerton did not uncover the problems regarding cracks on the interior surface of the spray dryer. Yet a further inspection, conducted just six months later, found multiple issues of cracks and dents inside the dryer. What changed? The 2023 inspection was conducted during a production shutdown and was far less detailed than the 2024 inspection.
The level of scrutiny adhered to by FDA investigators during an inspection also is determined by the reason for the inspection. Routine surveillance inspections are less intensive than inspections conducted “for cause” (e.g., as part of a foodborne disease outbreak investigation). A clean inspection report (one classified as No Action Indicated) is no guarantee that everything is under control. Rather, it means that no problems were uncovered at the level of scrutiny practiced by the FDA inspector(s) during that inspection.
Could the botulism problem have been prevented?
All of the inspection reports released by the FDA for the three ByHeart locations predate the investigation into the ongoing infant botulism outbreak.
While it is impossible to draw conclusions based on the information available so far, one thing is clear.
Both the Reading and the Allerton production facilities were experiencing deteriorating sanitation, pest control, and microbiological safety conditions during the 2023-2025 period.
Corporate attitude is fundamental to food safety
ByHeart’s attitude to food safety and quality assurance was reflected in the statement of the company’s Senior Director of Food Safety (now Vice President, Quality), who expressed the view that evidence of rodent infestation in the ingredients was not a food safety concern as long as there was a ‘kill step’ in the production process to eliminate microbes.
“Reads like a true crime novel” – Food Safety News
Interested in learning more about food safety and the history of foodborne disease outbreaks and investigations?
Click on the link to listen to a short excerpt, then follow the buy links to add a digital, print or audio copy to your personal library.
In an update posted on the company’s website, ByHeart is warning its customers that “…all ByHeart formula across all product lots…” may be contaminated with Clostridium botulinum.
The warning comes after the company’s third-party testing lab (IEH IEH Laboratories & Consulting Group) found Clostridium botulinumin three out of three production lots. Five out of 36 samples tested were positive for the pathogen.
On November 11, 2025, ByHeart expanded an earlier product recall include all batches of ByHeart Whole Nutrition Infant Formula cans and Anywhere Pack™. The recalled products were distributed on-line and nationwide across the United States, including Guam and Puerto Rico.
Information provided to the FDA by Amazon indicates that a limited quantity of recalled products also were distributed to Argentina, Brazil, Brunei, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Ecuador, Egypt, Hong Kong, Israel, Jamaica, Japan, Republic of Korea, Peru, Philippines, Romania, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand, and Virgin Islands.
As of November 19, 2025, the CDC reported 31 confirmed and suspected cases of infant botulism associated with consumption of ByHeart powdered infant formula. The affected infants range in age from 16 to 200 days.
In its communication to parents and caregivers, ByHeart has issued the following advice and information:
We want to reaffirm the critical direction for parents and caregivers to stop using ByHeart formula immediately. We continue to strongly recommend monitoring for symptoms of infant botulism and to contact a medical professional immediately if your child develops symptoms.
According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, the sign of Infant Botulism appears at an estimated 3 to 30 days from the time of consumption of the Clostridium botulinum bacteria.
Symptoms often begin with constipation followed by difficulty feeding (sucking and swallowing), a weak and altered cry, diminished facial expression, droopy eyelids, loss of head control, and lethargy.
“Reads like a true crime novel” – Food Safety News
Interested in learning more about food safety and the history of foodborne disease outbreaks and investigations?
Click on the link to listen to a short excerpt, then follow the buy links to add a digital, print or audio copy to your personal library.